Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LearnUpon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 17:28, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

LearnUpon

LearnUpon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm seeing non-notable awards, but nothing convincing past one review to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. The article was declined at AfC but the user opted to move it into mainspace themselves. jcc (tea and biscuits) 15:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 16:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 16:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Delete Corporate spam, no indications of notability, references are all either PRIMARY sources or references that rely on corporate announcements, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.